The Voice of America has dismissed the former chief of its Mandarin-language service and suspended another manager following a more than yearlong investigation into the abrupt termination of a live interview with a high-profile critic of the Chinese government.
The agency also said independent investigators found no evidence to support allegations the U.S. government agency caved in to pressure from the Beijing government and may have been infiltrated by a Chinese spy.

VOA Director Amanda Bennett announced the action in an emailed message to staff Thursday, saying the agency has today removed one Mandarin Service employee and given a period of suspension to another.
Voice Of America Fires Three Staff Over Explosive Guo Wengui Interview
Two other Mandarin Service staffers represented by a government employees union are awaiting a decision on disciplinary action. A fifth employee returned to work shortly after the incident. The Mandarin Service reaches 40 million people weekly in China.
Bennett declined in an interview to identify the individuals involved, saying it is a personnel matter. However, the long-suspended service chief, Sasha Gong, confirmed that she has been dismissed and another manager, Huchen Zhang, confirmed he has been suspended.
Gong, who has publicly accused the agency of cutting off the interview with Chinese businessman Guo Wengui because of pressure from Beijing, referred questions to her lawyer, Paul Kiyonaga, who said he and Gong will challenge the dismissal using all available means of legal redress.
The Voice Of America Will Sound Like Trump
This decision to fire her from VOA is a travesty for anyone who believes in the First Amendment, journalistic integrity and the independence of our federal agencies, Kiyonaga said.
In her message to VOA staff, Bennett said the personnel action came only after four separate investigations all concluded the interview's termination was a result of VOA leadership's attempt to enforce previously agreed-upon journalistic standards. The investigations found no evidence to support allegations that pressure from the Chinese government, purportedly driven by 'spies' within VOA, had caused the termination.
One of those investigations was handled by the State Department's Office of Inspector General upon a request from members of Congress, and another was conducted by an award-winning professor of journalism at the University of Maryland. An outside counsel also supported the management position after a three-month investigation, and the fourth was conducted by VOA's security department.
Voice Of America Staff Briefly Detained In China
Guo, a U.S.-based businessman, had already raised Chinese hackles at the time of the April 2017 interview with a series of dramatic allegations about corruption among highly placed Chinese officials and their families.
Bennett confirmed that China had sought to block the interview — which had been widely promoted in advance by the Mandarin Service — by calling VOA journalists in Washington and Beijing and lobbying for them to cancel it. China also issued an Interpol Red Notice for Guo's arrest shortly before the interview.
The interview, which was streamed live on social media, went ahead in spite of the warnings. But about 1 hour and 20 minutes into what had been promoted as a three-hour webcast, viewers saw the camera cut to a host, who drew a finger across his throat, and then the screen went dark.

Taiwan's Vice President Makes San Francisco Stop
Guo later denounced the decision, writing on his Twitter feed that it was the result of pressure from various parties and telling the
VOA managers rejected the charge, saying the live webcast was cut because Gong and her staff had been told to limit it to one hour to reduce the likelihood of Guo making accusations that could not be vetted for accuracy or rebutted by the other side.
Bennett explained the decision to let the interview run live for one hour, saying, Since it was already arranged, we didn't want to cancel it, but we wanted to minimize the opportunity for unprofessional behavior. Managers said the Mandarin staff were told they could record the final two hours for future use after proper vetting.
History Of Voa
However, Kiyonaga argued that Gong was never ordered to cut short the interview. In fact, VOA itself termed the cutoff of the interview the product of 'miscommunication' — not insubordination — in its own press release, issued shortly after the interview.
Bennett insisted in an interview that the order had been given, and an independent analysis by Mark Feldstein, an award-winning broadcast journalist and Richard Eaton Chair of Broadcast Journalism at the University of Maryland, supported VOA management's decision.

The email quoted Feldstein as saying the Mandarin Service's failure to comply with instructions was a colossal and unprecedented violation of journalistic professionalism and broadcast industry standards. Reached by email, Feldstein confirmed he was accurately quoted but declined to comment further before consulting with a lawyer.
Voice Of America
Kiyonaga still maintained Thursday that it was only after [China] launched an aggressive campaign to silence Guo Wengui that VOA management caved and began its efforts to curtail the length and content of this critically important interview, a decision he described as a blatant affront to VOA's core mission to provide robust, unflinching reporting and information to its audience worldwide.”
But Bennett's message to staff said the State Department inspector general's report concluded that the decision to curtail the Guo interview was based solely on journalistic best practices rather than any pressure from the Chinese government.
The internal security review found no evidence to support allegations that elements of the Chinese government had infiltrated VOA and compelled the interview to be censored or cut short, Bennett added.
Betty Lee Sung, Pioneering Scholar Of Chinese In America, Dies At 98
Asked about those claims in the interview, Bennett said, Any time you have allegations that a foreign power has infiltrated a U.S. government agency and directed its actions, that is a very serious matter, and we took it very seriously. ... We found no evidence whatsoever that it is true.
![]()
Going forward, she said she hopes the agency's actions will show that we are a professional news organization that follows best journalism practices, that doesn't back down, that corrects its mistakes, but if it is correct, stands behind its reporting. And that we expect professional behavior from every member of our staff.David Firestein, Institute’s Perot fellow and vice president for the Strategic Trust-Building Initiative, was interviewed in Chinese by Voice of America (VOA) Mandarin Service as a panelist on
Appearing with Firestein on the panel were Robert Daly, director of the Kissinger Institute on China and the United States at the Wilson Center, and Charles Laughlin, chair of Asian Studies at the University of Virginia. In the first part of the discussion, the panelists offered reflections on their careers and experiences working with and on China, and the second part focused on the latitude for free expression and openness to different ideas in China and Chinese culture. Firestein’s comments on the program are summarized below.
Miao Yu, Shih Wei Chou, Bo Xu, Sharon Wu, Mandarin Service
Firestein visited China for the first time in 1984 as a tourist. He later studied international relations and Mandarin before being posted to China as a U.S. diplomat. In his personal experience, today’s China is vastly different from the China of 30 years ago. He noted two of the most evident changes: first, the greatly increased pace of life and its attendant toll on the quality of interpersonal bonds; and second—and more fundamentally—the increasing space for choice in the individual lives of Chinese. Firestein also noted that the Chinese Ministry of Education’s recent decision to curb the flow of Western ideas and values into Chinese academic institutions was unfortunate. In his view, innovation and new ideas are at the heart of China’s continued economic development, and this decision represents a step backwards on that path.
Firestein noted that the main difference between American and Chinese culture is the emphasis placed on people’s right to free choice. According to Firestein, free choice in the United States is considered a sacred right and an integral aspect of being a human being; this derives from the country’s Judeo-Christian roots. China is also developing in this regard; for example, relative to the 1980s, Chinese people now have greater freedom to make choices in their own lives on matters such as their education, employment and foreign travel. However, Firestein noted that some recent trends in China toward greater restrictions on expression in artistic and intellectual fields are concerning, and expressed hope that China will continue to work to build an open and innovative society.Washington, D.C. - Two Voice of America Mandarin Service correspondents, Yibing Feng, a U.S. citizen and full time VOA staffer, and his Chinese assistant were detained by Chinese authorities this evening while conducting an interview. The two were taken in Jinan, Shandong province while interviewing Professor Wenguang Sun, 84.
“The two VOA correspondents should be released immediately, ” said VOA Director Amanda Bennett. “It is outrageous that two journalists have been detained for nothing more than doing their jobs.”

Fans Pay Tribute To Coco Lee, Hong Kong Singer Who Had International Success
Today's actions by Chinese officials follow the events of two weeks ago when Professor Sun was detained during a live telephone interview with VOA from his home. He reported to the VOA anchor that local police had forcibly entered his residence and demanded he end the interview. When Professor Sun refused, the phone line went dead on live television.
VOA attempted to interview the professor upon his return, and Professor Sun was speaking to Feng behind a closed door in the hallway of his building. Five or six
Posting Komentar untuk "Voice Of America Mandarin Service"